| It was particularly important to obtain the perspectives of
co-ordinators in small, rural programs where the realities of
running a program can differ substantially from the realities of
running a large urban program |
|
|
The Advisory Committee
We formed an advisory committee to the project consisting of the
three Prospects staff, Maureen Sanders, Margaret Reine and Susan
Devins, as well as co-ordinators from three other literacy
programs: Terry Regimbald from STAR Literacy Program in St.
Albert, Sandra Dye from A.L.P.H.A. project in Wildwood and Carol
Ulmer from Drayton Valley Adult Literacy Society. Ken MacDonald,
Chair of the Prospects Board from 1993-1995 was also A member of
this committee.
The committee met three times to provide feedback during the
course of the project, to serve as a sounding board throughout the
project and to evaluate the achievement of the objectives.
Committee members also responded to drafts of this report. It was
particularly important to obtain the perspectives of co-ordinators
in small, rural programs where the realities of running a program
can differ substantially from the realities of a large urban
program. We wanted to ensure that any findings from our study
would be applicable to programs of all kinds across the province.
|
To collect data we would:
· track our time over a 4 month period
· compare participation summaries over 3 years
· do analysis of board of directors |
|
|
Collecting Data
We decided to gather, in three ways, the data needed to help us
determine the effectiveness of our program. First, we would track
where we spent our time over a period of several months. This
would demonstrate whether or not we were balanced in our approach
to program management
Second, we would do a comparison over time of our year-end
Program Participation Summaries compiled for our provincial
government funder. Since we had been making conscious efforts in
the area of 50/50 Management for more than a year, we felt that
looking at statistics for year-end 1992 and 1993 along with the
coming 1994 year-end figures might provide a reasonable picture of
our progress towards our goal of a more effective program.
Third, we wanted to do some analysis of the Board of Directors |