|
| Ties to business and industry in each local
area can be strengthened. Where some business input is now provided
by PIC staff or by spouses of program staff who are influential in
the business community, it appears that programs could benefit from
the marketing, fund-raising, and management skills of the business
community
. One partner
expressed the business
community's attitude towards the program, saying, "Just the
atmosphere of the town is something the business community needs.
It's not for things for all of us to make money off of."
|
| Seamen et al 1992: 28 |
|
|
Hord (in Mawhinney 1993) proposes that inter-agency interactions can
be placed along a continuum of cooperation that ranges from
coordination to collaboration (37). Researchers agree that successful
interventions require, at minimum, the coordination of professionals
who are providing services for children and families. Some argue,
however, that a more expansive approach requires collaboration where "organizations
join to create improvements in children's services that are no single
agency's responsibility" (Kirst in Mawhinney 1993: 37).
If we look at types of partnerships on a continuum, as Hord
suggests, where as you move along the continuum interactions become
more complex and expectations for mutual benefit increase, we can
describe their different characteristics as in Table 1 on page 23.
"Partnerships," therefore, can include a number of
different types of relationships. A community project to support
family literacy can involve different types of partnerships with
different agencies simultaneously. You might have a relationship based
on sponsorship with the Rotary Club, for example, and also have a
cooperative arrangement with Social Services where they provide
referrals into your program. Relationships with community partners
will almost inevitably change and evolve as the project progresses.
Why are partnerships important?
There has been a great deal of attention and emphasis placed on
partnerships and collaborations in recent years. The reasons behind
this focus have been economic, political, and social.
We have seen a marked increase, not only in Alberta but across
Canada and beyond, in holistic approaches in the ways in which we
support and deliver services to individuals, families, and
communities.
Many human service agencies have come to realize the inadequacies of
systems based on fragmentation and categorization of the needs of
adults and children. These needs have traditionally been met by a
diverse and separate array of government departments, social and human
service agencies, and educational institutions. Without the links
provided by partnerships, these agencies may be unaware of the extent
and range of their clients' needs, of the services and support offered
by other agencies, and therefore of where the gaps in service delivery
exist (Bradford 1993). As Kunesh and Farley (1993) and Mawhinney
(1993) point out, the challenges and barriers that many members of our
communities face are interactive and interrelated. Children and
families who experience one are likely to experience others as well.
Therefore, our solutions and services must also be interrelated. |