At-risk families have so many other issues going on; literacy sometimes can be the last thing that needs to be addressed. We really felt we needed some of these other partners, and people who would be able to make an impact on the families. We also felt the need for the clientele to have that broad range of services as soon as they made contact with one agency, so that whatever their need was, all the agencies could work together to try and find what could help them best.

family literacy coordinator
FLAG interviews 1995

Brizius and Foster (1993) give the following reasons for family literacy programs to build partnerships with other agencies:

  • to use existing resources and expertise, as much as possible, to create and implement a family literacy program;
  • as a means of identifying and learning about your community's needs and resources from those directly involved;
  • to gain the support of agencies, institutions, and government;
  • to raise the resources to do a good job; and
  • to prepare the community for a family literacy program (79)

The reasons family literacy coordinators gave for seeking partners during our 1995 interviews are given in Table 2 in Chapter IV. They can be summarized as:

  • recruitment/access to target group
  • financial reasons
  • to include family literacy as one component of another program
  • because it "makes sense" in terms of natural evolution of community services, being the most efficient, effective means of delivering programs
  • to create a greater awareness of family literacy

Finally, one coordinator explained her reasons for seeking community partners in terms of a recognition that family literacy collaborations may strengthen the family unit, and increase the self-concept of individuals within a family so that they can be less than helpless.

Concerns about partnerships
While an integrated approach to meeting individual and family needs is generally acknowledged as beneficial and desirable, there are those who raise important concerns. Capper (1994) cites a range of sources to support the idea that inter-agency coordination in itself is no guarantee of positive changes in service delivery and may lead to the following problems:

  • centralization of services, which can limit client choices, result in organizational goals to meet organization rather than client needs, and put pressure on limited financial resources by increasing access and demand for services (258);


Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page