Research
in Practice—the backgroundn
Practice—the background
There is
a growing interest in research in literacy practice in Canada. In February
1996, the National Literacy Secretariat (NLS) hosted a discussion on
literacy research. Participants identified a need to advance literacy
research and practice in Canada. Following this Mary Norton and Yvon
Laberge carried out a survey that identified an interest in research
in practice and challenges to practitioners engaging in research.
In 1997
a research in practice seminar was held in Edmonton where eighteen participants
reviewed literacy practitioner research networks that had been attempted
in Canada and ones that were established in Australia, the UK and the
USA. That same year, the Learning Centre in Edmonton partnered with
the University Faculty of Education and with funding from the NLS explored
participatory approaches in literacy education. Following closely, in
1998, the NLS produced Enhancing literacy research in Canada
which highlighted the need for research capacity building at home. By
this time Alberta and British Columbia were organizing literacy research
in practice efforts. The Canadian Association for the Study of Adult
Education Regional Conference held in Halifax in 1998 focused on practitioner
action research and a national project based at the University of Ottawa
with Dr. Maurice Taylor involved 10 practitioners researching workplace
literacy.
The Research
in Practice in Adult Literacy (RiPAL) network was established in 2000
in Alberta. A Gathering about literacy research in practice was held
in Edmonton in 2001, with another held in BC in 2002 and the Research
in Practice Institute in St. John’s NF in 2003. This bulletin and the
electronic forum that accompanies it begins the research conversation
in NB. (taken from “It simply makes us better” by Mary Norton
and Allan Quigley, 2002)

Research
in Practice Institutes: Venturing forth
– by Sally Crawford
“Your Jenny
Horseman is speaking at a literacy conference in Edmonton. You should
go.” My Jenny Horseman? Me go to a literacy conference?
It was this off-hand comment that launched me on the road to connecting
with other folk around the world concerned with literacy practices,
reflection and research.
…“What
unites us all and must encourage us all is the passionate
belief that what we do counts.” Sally Crawford,
Family Literacy
Practitioner, Fredericton. |
|
I had come
across an article by Jenny decrying “but I’m not a therapist!”
The words immediately resonated with me. Here was a chance to speak with
her and to meet others in the field. What did I know about research in
practice? Thinking I was venturing forth under false pretences I went
to Edmonton to participate in Bearing Blossoms…Sowing Seeds. A Gathering
about Literacy Research in Practice, 2001.
The next
year, to my amazement, there was another Gathering, Portraits of
Literacy, in Vancouver! I had been involved with an action research
project with Dr. Pam Whitty and Dr. Pam Nason at The University of New
Brunswick. Pam Whitty suggested that we attend and present a paper about
the work. She, Cheryl Brown and I (from The Saint John Learning Exchange)
facilitated an inquiry group about developing partnerships and policy
to sustain intergenerational and family literacy programs. I listened.
I learned. I peeled back more layers of literacy practice. I took delight
in “welcoming the wild” and the “not literacy” pedagogy as Elsa Auerbach
phrased the work. I began to feel that perhaps I had something to contribute.

Off
to Newfoundland...Sally’s adventure continues...
Off
to the Rock I went for Research in Practice in Adult Literacy.
Participating in Marina Niks’ sessions on “Getting Started in Research
in Practice” gave me the confidence to realize that I was doing, and
could do research. We focused on what is research? who does it? and
how? My journey to this point was not unlike Learners in literacy programs
who travel from being hesitantly eager, to belonging, to realizing and
raising their voices. I went home more determined than ever to do research
in practice.
I am aware
of the undercurrents, the politics and the tensions occurring in the
field. Yet, we seem to soldier on, under funded and undervalued. There
is rarely enough time to do everything. We make muffins; write proposals,
lobby policy makers and do everything in between.
All this
and do research as well?! The task is HUGE! But what unites us all and
must encourage us all is the passionate belief that what we do counts. |