View this entire issue as a PDF (104k)

graphic header: LCNB Ltd. June 2004 - Volume 1, Issue 4

Inside this issue:

Reflections of a novice researcher

Qualitative Research



graphic: flowers

Special points of interest:

· Guaranteed employment should not be an outcome of a literacy program.

· Literacy practitioners rarely have an opportunity to converse with their peers.

· Qualitative research has different methods and therefore different assumptions than qualitative research.

· Funding mechanisms often weigh the success of a program on attendance or academic achievement.


graphic: LCNB logo

Community of Inquiry

Revisiting literacy and employment:
a research study
by Pat Campbell

“I finished my course… I couldn’t find a job you know… Like at this moment like, I can’t say anything, I’m so disappointed.” (female participant).

To what extent do literacy programs have a positive impact on employment? Does participation in literacy programs lead to increased economic well being? A decade ago, Dr. Grace Malicky and Dr. Charles Norman explored the relationship between participation in literacy programs and employment status a decade ago. Their findings are worth revisiting.

A total of 94 adults enrolled in urban literacy programs participated in this three-year study. Forty participants were Canadian-born; and 54 were immigrants, primarily Asian. The majority of participants were attending formal literacy programs on a full-time basis. All the literacy programs either explicitly stated or implied vocational goals in their program agendas.

Formal testing was used to assess reading achievement; and interviews were used to gather information on employment history, vocational goals, and reasons for entering the program. Follow-up interviews were conducted at six-month intervals across a 3-year period. The purpose of the interviews was to monitor any changes in the vocational goals and employment status of participants both during participation and after leaving their literacy programs.

The study found that before starting literacy programs, most participants were employed in the service sector, making low wages and often living below the poverty line.

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Job as outcome disappoints learners...

The majority of learners believed that participation in literacy programs would lead to more and better job opportunities, and they cited this factor among their list of reasons for enrolling in the program. However, during the course of their programs, the participants’ optimism began to wane. They reduced their expectations about job prospects, and frequently became frustrated and discouraged. After completing programs, many realized their doubts were wellfounded.

At the end of their program, most participants returned to the same type of jobs they had held before enrolling in literacy classes, sometimes even with the same employer. On the few occasions when participants did find jobs in the new areas in which they were trained, the positions were part-time. In fact, none of the participants in the study achieved their vocational goal, which was to obtain a full-time job in a specific area.

continued on page 2...



Community of Inquiry Archive Table of Contents Next Page