Vivian Shalla and Grant Schellenberg, The Centre for International Statistics, Canadian Council on Social Development

Adult literacy is fundamental to the economic and competitive performance of modern nations. Close to 50% of adults with low-level literacy live in low-income households, compared with only 8% of those with high-level literacy skills. This report seeks to fill that research gap by addressing three topics: the relationship between literacy and economic security or well-being; the link between economic security and literacy practices; and the connection between economic security and the transfer of literacy skills from parent to child.

Working-age adults with weak literacy skills were far more likely to be living in low-income households than those with strong literacy skills. The risk of living in a household below the low income housing cut-offs (LICO) was six times greater for working-age adults at level 1 than for those at level 4/5 (47% vs. 8%). However, the likelihood of living in a low-income household was substantially reduced, from 47% to 22%, by having skills just one level above the lowest level of proficiency.

Sex plays a distinct role, which overrides literacy and its effect on household or personal income. For example, at all literacy levels, women were more likely than men to be living in low-income households and, both at levels 2 and 3, women’s likelihood of falling below the LICO was roughly twice that of men. The average personal income of adults with level 1 skills was around $16,400 per year, or only two-thirds the average personal income of adults at level 4/5 ($24,200). Men received approximately twice as much income as women at each literacy level. In fact, women with the highest literacy levels had an average annual income of $22,600, only slightly above that of men with the lowest literacy levels who earned an average annual income of $19,800.

Working-age adults with weak level 1 skills (59%) were far less likely to have been employed during the year than those with strong level 4/5 skills (89%). Furthermore, those individuals who were employed had fewer weeks of work than adults with stronger literacy skills.

Adults’ opportunities to cultivate literacy skills are shaped by many factors, including labour market participation, the types of jobs they hold, and their access to training and education. Because access to such opportunities varies widely some adults are less able than others to build on their literacy skills.

Adults with marginal literacy skills received less job-related training and education than those with high-level skills.As individuals with low-level literacy skills were more likely to live in low-income households, it follows that low-income adults also received less training. Individuals from low-income households wanted career or job-related training just as much as those who were in better economic circumstances and explained that cost was the most significant impediment to pursuing job-related training or educational opportunities. Conversely, lack of time was the main barrier for adults who were not in low-income households.

Adults from low-income households are far less likely to engage in literacy activities on the job than are workers from other households. These adults show a low rate of involvement across a wide range of reading and writing indicators. This may reflect the low level of the worker’s own skills or it may be further evidence to support the finding that adults from low-income households appear to be concentrated in jobs that require fewer literacy skills and offer fewer opportunities to develop them.

Literacy is not practiced exclusively at work: People have the opportunity to read and write in the course of daily activities, and to maintain and enhance their literacy skills. Working-age adults from low-income households engaged in literacy activities outside of their work less often than those from non-low-income households. Adults in low-income households were six times more likely to need help reading newspaper articles and five times more likely to need help reading instructions on medicine bottles than higher income adults.

Although economic disadvantage and limited opportunities may restrict their literacy activities, low-income parents nonetheless provide their children with at least some of the conditions needed to engage in literacy practices. Most homes, regardless of income status, have a variety of reading materials, although low-income households are somewhat less likely to have such items as newspapers and books.

Children from both types of households most often obtained their books from school libraries. Books purchased by parents and borrowed from public libraries were the next most common sources of reading material for children. A higher proportion of children from non-low-income homes made use of each of these sources. About half of children from both low- and non-low-income households had time set aside each day for reading at home, and over half had limits on the time they were allowed to spend watching television.

It appears that most children, regardless of economic circumstances, have access to books and are provided with opportunities to read. But children from low-income households do not tend to read as frequently.

The findings from this study point to a connection between economic security and the practice of literacy. Adults living in low-income households receive less job-related training and education, and engage less frequently in activities (both on the job and in the home) that favour the development of literacy abilities.

While literacy is strongly associated with economic life chances and opportunities, this relationship is not as straightforward when gender is taken into account. Women with stronger literacy skills are not as highly rewarded in the labour market as men with similar or even weaker literacy skills. The gender-segregated nature of the labour market and women’s predominant responsibilities for household work and child care may help to explain why women derive fewer benefits from investing in their literacy skills.

(For the full text or PDF document, please visit the NLS website at: http://www.nald.ca/nls.htm )