|
Alberta Vocational College -
Calgary |
|
Second and Third Generation CAI With the advent of increased computer power and swift and accessible telecommunications, development of CAI has increasingly adopted multimedia approaches to delivery. Multimedia software incorporates text, graphics, animation, pictures, video, and sound to present information. In the literature these new learning environments are being called "second generation CAI". First generation CAI is defined by the limitations of the medium, primarily forcing learners to engage in simple learning tasks. Second generation CAI increases in complexity of design allowing learners to engage in complex processing, inference making, semantic elaboration and several means of monitoring, retrieval and feedback A third generation of CAI is emerging which offers assistance to students through guided constructive approaches to learning (Goodfellow, 1995). Research results surrounding this medium are few. Early indications are that learners are better able to acquire vocabulary and improve comprehension, primarily due to the ability of these new programs to assist the learner in making various associations in more realistic and varied contexts (Chun and Plass, 1996a; Chun and Plass, 1996b; Goodfellow, 1995; McBride and Seago, 1996). Also, this new medium is reported to improve student attitude toward subject material and learning in general ( Brett, 1996). Another encouraging feature of multimedia being reported is that various media appear to be successful in encouraging learners to take more responsibility for their own learning (McBride and Seago, 1996). While we will witness an increase in the use of multimedia in all
aspects of education and training, measurement of its effect on
learning will be even more complex and controversial than with first
generation CAI. As Najjar (1996, p. 129) suggests, people tend to
share a common assumption that multimedia information helps people
learn, an assumption "based more on personal opinion than on
scientifically-based fact." He goes on to say that: A growing concern in the measurement of effect of CAI on learning, whether multimedia or first generation programming is the issue of measuring learning differently. As Najjar (1996) points out, if we present information using the new media, should we not test using the same media? |