Managers and labour leaders demonstrated a remarkable degree of agreement on the actions they felt to be most important in addressing skills needs. From a list of 16 possible actions (Figure 26) they were asked to evaluate how important each would be in meeting their own organization’s human resource and skills requirements over the next five yearsFootnote 20. Each action was rated as being either "not important", "somewhat important" or "very important". Out of the list of 16 possible actions, five emerged as the top five actions of private and public sector managers and labour leaders:

Figure 26. Actions to Address Future Labour and Skills Requirements (% saying action is "very important")
private sector managers public sector managers private sector labour leaders public sector labour leaders
The figures in bold represent the 5 actions most commonly viewed as "very important"
Taking specific measures to retain current employees 45% 46% 47% 50%
Upgrading skills of current employees 44% 47% 70% 59%
Improving succession planning 43% 51% 59% 66%
Hiring young labour market entrants 39% 36% 68% 63%
Mentoring of young workers by older workers 38% 43% 63% 55%
Attracting workers from other organizations 21% 19% 11% 14%
Extending the working careers of older Canadians 20% 17% 10% 17%
Changing job descriptions: reallocating work 17% 17% 21% 22%
Substituting machinery/equipment/technology for labour 15% 4% 32% 19%
Hiring new immigrants 15% 16% 16% 20%
Hiring Aboriginal people 11% 23% 30% 28%
Contracting out 11% 5% 42% 37%
Hiring Visible minorities 7% 12% 19% 25%
Hiring people with a disability 6% 11% 14% 22%
Downsizing 6% 4% 34% 32%
Recruiting workers directly from abroad 6% 6% 4% 7%

Less important actions for dealing with skills requirements included attracting workers from other organizations, extending the careers of older Canadians, and changing job descriptions or reallocating work. In addition, although managers and labour leaders often described the hiring of young labour market entrants as very important, they were much less inclined to give the same rating to the hiring of specific groups within the population such as immigrants, Aboriginal peoples, members of a visible minority, or persons with disabilities. Three actions - substituting machinery or technology for labour, contracting out, and downsizing - were seldom viewed by managers as very important. In comparison, a much higher percentage of labour leaders described these as very important; perhaps further indication of their scepticism or lack of trust with management over the solutions to future skills and human resource requirements.

Skip footnote section


Return to note 20 Labour leaders were asked this question with reference to the organizations where their union members work.