PROGRAM EVALUATION Workplace Education Practitioners' Forum
| 1. |
What I thought was the most
valuable about this two day think-tank was: |
- networking
- thinking about the issues with colleagues
- Defined context for further discussion and action
- Great time
- NLS objective/framing well articulated and useful
- Nothing was assumed, every ambiguity was explored this will
hope turn the 'pre-meeting' into a meaningful 'meeting'
- Opportunity to define workplace roles and put forward ideas
for moving forward
- Meeting - putting faces to some of the names I have seen in
print.
- Hearing of national concerns was also good
- Great opportunity to network - understand national
perspective -get a sense of diversity, the many pros and cons around issues,
the uniqueness of W.E.
- Watching your process
- Interacting with colleagues from across the country
- Networking
- Different points of view of certification and
accreditation
- Getting a snapshot/meeting people doing the same thing
(different language)
- Reconnecting with peers and making new friends
- Networking
- Sharing information
- Understanding of this issues
- Networking and the struggle - with skilled facilitation
- Meeting the people, lessening the isolation
- Hearing perspectives direction from action oriented committed
people
- Face to face contact, support and idea generation
- Networking with others
- The coming together of people from different regions
- The informal discussions - the opportunity to learn from
others
- Networking - putting names to faces
- Having the opportunity to meet with other WP practitioners
and realize the scope of WP Ed.
|