PROGRAM EVALUATION
Workplace Education Practitioners' Forum

1. What I thought was the most valuable about this two day think-tank was:
  • networking
  • thinking about the issues with colleagues
  • Defined context for further discussion and action
  • Great time
  • NLS objective/framing well articulated and useful
  • Nothing was assumed, every ambiguity was explored this will hope turn the 'pre-meeting' into a meaningful 'meeting'
  • Opportunity to define workplace roles and put forward ideas for moving forward
  • Meeting - putting faces to some of the names I have seen in print.
  • Hearing of national concerns was also good
  • Great opportunity to network - understand national perspective -get a sense of diversity, the many pros and cons around issues, the uniqueness of W.E.
  • Watching your process
  • Interacting with colleagues from across the country
  • Networking
  • Different points of view of certification and accreditation
  • Getting a snapshot/meeting people doing the same thing (different language)
  • Reconnecting with peers and making new friends
  • Networking
  • Sharing information
  • Understanding of this issues
  • Networking and the struggle - with skilled facilitation
  • Meeting the people, lessening the isolation
  • Hearing perspectives direction from action oriented committed people
  • Face to face contact, support and idea generation
  • Networking with others
  • The coming together of people from different regions
  • The informal discussions - the opportunity to learn from others
  • Networking - putting names to faces
  • Having the opportunity to meet with other WP practitioners and realize the scope of WP Ed.

Workplace Education Practitioners' Forum
Summary Report



Back Table of Contents Next