|
For me, the personal relationships with participants lie at the heart of the issue of informed consent, which means being clear and honest about myself with others and maintaining a sensitivity to people's level of comfort and discomfort. As well, my awareness of the relative power and privilege of my position was also important, as will be discussed in a later chapter. One of the students, who consented to a non-tape recorded interview and chose a pseudonym, did not give consent to being observed. At that time I did not explore further with the student what "no observation" meant. During my fieldwork, I did not remain continually and consciously aware of this request for no observation. During post-fieldwork analysis I was abruptly reminded of this request when I reread the signed consent form and my note at the top - No Observation. My observations of interactions and events at the Centre had included this student and there were key incidents during my fieldwork in which this student was central. To deal with this situation, I did not identify this student directly when describing the events and interactions that included this person. In retrospect, I see that the informed consent that I set up consisted of choices that were not fully explored - specifically the choice to not be involved in the research, to not be observed or to participate at different levels. The issues around informed consent are complex and require an ongoing questioning of the process of negotiation between researcher and participants, since consent is such an important process of building relationships in research. RelationshipsSince a major component of ethnographic research is building trust, I was very conscious of the importance of getting to know people on their terms, and of actively listening and allowing for time to complete my research agenda. An excerpt from my field notes describes this process with a student who had expressed his nervousness about the research process:
|
| Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page |