•   From practice to theory and back again   •


Checking the Baggage:
Passion and Perspective

Early on in the research process I was daunted by the enormity of change as a topic, so much so that I strayed from this topic of longstanding interest in search of another. I explored other areas that I found fascinating, in particular reflective thinking and Stephen Brookfield’s concepts as they relate to personal learning. I narrowed my focus, formulated a new question and asked myself yet again, “Why do I want to know the answer to this question?” After peeling back the layers, I was reminded of the idiom “You can take the boy out of the country but you can’t take the country out of the boy.” The answer to this new question, formulated through exploration of other areas, would lead me back to my original topic by providing insight into catalysts for change.

This process immediately reaffirmed for me two things. First, quite simply, researchers are more apt to go beyond the usual—to take risks and seek creative solutions—if further knowledge and understanding in an area of strong personal interest is among the rewards. The circuitous route that led me back to my original topic bears witness to this. Many factors contribute to successful research: economics, personal and professional supports, adaptability, self-discipline, and sustainability of interest, to name a few. All things being equal, in the end, quality of research may hinge on the level of personal interest—the passion—the researcher has for the topic.

The second thing relates to bias and its impact. My interest in the topic of change and my unconscious inclination to return to it via other routes is telling and demonstrates how bias can direct research. Similarly, bias affects practice, and the success of both can be limited by it; tendencies to view things from hard and fast viewpoints could restrict one’s ability to “see outside of the box.” Thus, recognition of bias is critical, and how it is addressed and the methods selected will affect outcomes. Possibilities include taking an objective stance, challenging the bias by seeking and being open to other perspectives, acknowledging and working with the bias to further learning in its direction, and further analysis of the bias itself. Analysis will aid in the detection of assumptions related to the bias and help to determine the underlying beliefs and values supporting it.

Personal beliefs as they relate to the value of formal1 and informal2 education stand as examples of the relationships that exist between bias, personal values and beliefs. There is recognition among literacy practitioners that both approaches to education are valuable and necessary in today’s society. Both contribute to a development of skills necessary to enable individuals to fully achieve personal fulfillment through the creation, pursuit and attainment of goals. However, a practitioner’s (and by extension a researcher’s) bias towards one or the other—as they relate to all spheres of society—may impact on practice (research).


1 Generally, primary, secondary, and post-secondary institutional learning.
2 Life experience/lessons, the “school of hard knocks.”

line graphic
Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page