|
Goals of this Study Given that education appears to enjoy a regular place within prison
programming, why study it? The purpose of conducting this study was
to: 1) describe the specific school models in five prisons in Manitoba
and Saskatchewan, 2) determine the reasons for participation in prison
schooling, 3) determine literacy-related goals which students are
setting for their return to the community, and 4) determine factors
which students believe will support or impede the achievement of these
goals upon release. Another goal of this study was to implement and test a model at
Brandon Correctional Institution which would involve a number of
volunteer tutors. The April 1996 Headingley riot in Manitoba aborted
that part of the research. The instability of the prison population in
Manitoba and concerns for prisoner safety did not allow for that to
occur. Research Methods and Questions Information for this report was gathered through the following
methods: 1) review of existing literature, 2) one on one interviews
with five prison teachers, 3) informal observation of prison
classrooms, 4) five focus group sessions with 57 students, and 5)
individual interviews with 48 students in prison schools. Two of the
five schools were located in provincial prisons(1)
and three were in federal prisons.(2)
All students were active in schooling at the time of the study. The first task in the research project was to obtain the consent of
prison administrators to proceed with the research within their
institutions. Following approval from prison authorities, teachers
within each of the five prisons were contacted in regards to the
purpose and methodology of the research. An information sheet was sent
to teachers who, in turn, informed students about this research.
Teachers informed students that they would be eligible for
participation if their release was likely to occur prior to the spring
of 1998. While some students were informed about the research by teachers
prior to the arrival of the researcher, all students who were
interested in participating in the research attended an information
session conducted by the researcher. Following the information
session, each student made a decision about participating. Fifty-seven
individuals decided to continue and participated in a focus group in
their institution. Following the focus group, individuals were given a
choice to continue with one-on-one interviews. Forty-eight students
completed the interview. A focus group, which ranged in size from nine to 14 participants,
was held within each prison school. Students in each of these five
groups were initially asked to discuss the reasons for their
participation in the prison school program. Secondly, each group was
asked for the kinds of school-related goals they have for when they
will be released. Finally, students were asked: "What factors
will influence the success of achieving literacy-related goals when
you are released?" After listing all of the factors on the chalkboard/whiteboard,
factors were grouped for similarity (ie: alcohol counselling and
alcohol treatment were combined). There were approximately ten factors
identified per focus group. Each person was given three "stick-on
notes" and asked to place them adjacent to the three factors they
believed would be most influential to their success. In addition to providing important information about success upon
release, the Focus Groups provided a starting point for each of the
students to consider within a group context the reason for their
participation in school. Focus groups also helped prisoners begin to
prepare for their individual interviews by thinking as a group about
the literacy-related goals which they set for their release and the
factors which would influence the success of their goals. During
individual interviews these questions were explored more
comprehensively. The research combined both quantitative and qualitative methods.
Most individual interviews were recorded by audio cassette. Questions
asked of prison literacy instructors pertained to the nature of their
prison school program, content of school work, admission into their
program, resources available, nature of teacher or peer/volunteer
support. In both the focus groups and the individual interviews, prisoners
were asked about their literacy-related goals upon release and the
factors which they believed would increase or decrease the success of
reaching those goals. A second phase of this research will conduct follow up interviews
with released individual participants. Phase II will measure the
success of identified literacy-related goals after students have lived
in the community for a minimum of three months. It will also measure
the factors influencing success of preestablished goals and consider
the importance of a supported reintegration plan. |
| BACK | CONTENTS | NEXT |